The fact that part of the EU population is still refusing experimental gene therapies against Covid-19 is a huge thorn in the side of the EU Commission. A recently published strategy paper lists no less than full vaccination and regular boosters for the entire population as a goal. The EU regime’s unbridled hatred of the unvaccinated is openly displayed: the refusal of Covid vaccination is concretely associated with anti-Western and anti-EU views and any critic of vaccination is so stylized as an enemy of the state, writes Vanessa Renner .
The document published on September 2, “ EU response to COVID-19: preparing for autumn and winter 2023 ” demonstrates a degree of aggressive denial of reality that makes the reader sick. There is talk of 2,300 deaths a week from (!) Covid-19, terrible consequential damage from Long Covid, yes, even the psychological damage many people suffer from restrictions and fear mongering is completely attributed to the “pandemic”. The EU Commission plays itself up as the new sect of doom, which can connect seamlessly with the world doom cult glued to the streets. However, the rescue in the Corona apocalypse does not lie in new or increased taxes and duties, but in the sanctuary of genetic vaccination.
It’s just a shame no one wants it anymore. “Since the end of April this year, the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the EU has hardly changed. Of the over-60s, 7.5% have not yet been vaccinated and 16.3% have not yet received their first booster. Looking at the vaccination rate among adults, 14.1% of people aged 18 and over have not been vaccinated and 35.5% have not received their first booster vaccination,” they complain. It is also considered a problem that the last vaccination was given several months ago. They do not hesitate to talk about a decrease in natural immunity after an infection, which, according to studies , is simply not true. The meaning is clear: “Safe” only exists for those who receive regular injections.
Vaccination pressure also for children
The presumed vaccination targets are accordingly. Instead of finally giving people complete freedom of choice, the signs still point to vaccination pressures. Closing “vaccination gaps ” has the highest priority:
“Improving immunization uptake under the primary vaccination course and the first booster vaccination in appropriate individuals, including appropriate children and adolescents according to national immunization schedules, remains a priority. This is particularly important for populations at higher risk of serious consequences and for countries with lower vaccination coverage.” – Source
As expected, even children are not safe from the European Commission’s vaccination frenzy. One can certainly take this as a direct attack on the next generation of citizens, because already in 2020, long before the much more harmless Omikron variant, according to recent calculations by Stanford professor Ioannidis , the covid death for young people under 20 years of age was only 0 . ,0003% . Vaccinations are of no use to children – but parents risk serious side effects from the gene injections. It is not for nothing that Denmark and Sweden have abolished childhood vaccinations.
Prioritized: Pregnant women only
But the end of the journey is far from in sight with a booster vaccination: “Certain population groups” are given priority for extra boosters (and are preferably vaccinated against flu at the same time). We are not only talking about the second booster and thus the fourth vaccination, but also boosters after that, especially for those whose last vaccination was six months ago. The “lucky” groups include the over 60s, people with previous illnesses, health professionals – and of course pregnant women. And this despite the fact that the safety of the preparations in pregnancy has never been seriously investigated. It is interesting to note that recently admitted that the mRNA of the vaccine is indeed passed on to the child through breast milk by nursing mothers. Something that had previously been vehemently denied and labeled as fake news – like the claim that the vaccination could harm the child in the womb . What if this eventually turns out to be true?
Fighting Critical Facts?
The EU Commission pays particular attention to the communication strategy for the vaccination campaign – because of course most citizens can only be persuaded to get a shot through appropriate manipulation and not because they themselves see the need for it for personal reasons. They want to continue to vigorously promote the vaccination and emphasize the alleged benefits of the gene injections, also for naturally immune persons. The communication strategy must be continuously updated and adapted to the circumstances – especially the public perception of vaccination and the “pandemic”. Very important: “misleading information” must be responded to immediately! Does experience show that the alleged fake news about the efficacy and safety of experimental gene therapy drugs matched the truth – is the EU Commission going against the facts here?
Meanwhile, this sentence is a slap in the face to any vaccine victim: “Clear, consistent and evidence-based messages demonstrating the continued safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines are critical.” It is later noted that so-called “lung covid” patients need very special help. People with vaccination damage therefore openly shit themselves (excuse me): side effects are not mentioned once in the document. The EU only wants to help those whose problems can be traced back to the virus. It’s good that in many cases it is unclear whether “longe covid” symptoms come from covid or rather from the gene injection…
Unvaccinated as enemies of the EU regime?
The icing on the cake is the association of skepticism about Covid vaccines with “anti-Western” and “anti-European” narratives: anyone who is not vaccinated or refuses yet another booster is therefore a danger to “the West” and the EU, it seems. And not only that: those who criticize vaccinations also often share so-called “disinformation” about the war in Ukraine. What is defined here as disinformation? An unpleasant fact about the history of the Ukraine conflict that may cast doubt on Ukraine’s supposed sanctity?
“The Political Dimension of Vaccination Refusal and Disinformation Campaigns in the Context of Anti-Western and Anti-EU Narratives. Particular challenges are the channels through which disinformation is spread in relation to other crises, especially the Russian military aggression against Ukraine.” – Source
Sharp criticism in parliament
Fortunately, the EU Commission’s highly questionable document is also sharply criticized by courageous MEPs. One of them is Christine Anderson, who dismantled the policy document during a press conference, raising the question: who is actually spreading the misinformation and misinformation? “It’s the pharmaceutical companies,” Anderson said. It is they, he said, who tell lies to make profit on profit. Anderson also sharply criticized vaccination criticism being labeled “anti- Western” and “anti-EU,” calling the prioritization of pregnant women abhorrent. You can watch the conference video here:
